神雕侠侣古天乐版
‘Hong Kong Alliance’ found guilty of inciting subversion; verdict clarifies boundaries between free speech and national security_我的网站
A | 以学促干谱新篇， 砥砺奋进新征程 杭州市文澜幼儿园党支部 12月党员固定日活动 会议前言 为深入学习贯彻党的二十届三中全会精神，奋力开创新时代政法改革新局面。中共杭州市文澜幼儿园支部委员会开展了主题为“以学促干谱新篇，砥砺奋进新征程”的12月党员固定日活动。
The anti-China group "Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China", along with its former chairman and vice-chairpersons Lee Cheuk-yan, Albert Ho Chun-yan and Chow Hang-tung, were charged with inciting others to subvert state power and have been remanded in custody since then. The local court in Hong Kong found two defendants guilty on Friday, and Ho pleaded guilty before the trial began, local media reported.
The central government's office for safeguarding national security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) voiced support for the court's lawful prosecution on Friday, saying that the verdict demonstrates the spirit of the rule of law and upholds the authority of the National Security Law (NSL) for Hong Kong.
The HKSAR government also welcomed the court's guilty verdict. HKSAR Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu said that for a long time, the Hong Kong Alliance had deliberately sown seeds of hatred toward the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the central government in Hong Kong society. Through various means, it sought to incite feelings of dislike and hatred toward the CPC and the central government among members of the public, and to encourage the public to subvert state power, RTHK reported.
The defendants' long-standing conduct endangered national security, and their plot was plainly evident and had to be punished, Lee said.
Inciting subversion of state power is an extremely serious offense, he said. The HKSAR government has a responsibility to safeguard national security and will resolutely prevent, stop and punish acts and activities that endanger national security, Lee noted.
In this case, the local court in Hong Kong clearly set out how Hong Kong courts understand and apply the provisions of the Chinese Constitution. The ruling will also serve as a legal principle and precedent, providing an important reference for future cases. It is consistent with legal principles and carries legal force, some legal experts said.
Looking back at the case, the prosecution and defense engaged in intense legal arguments over the boundaries between freedom of expression and national security, with the core dispute going to the constitutional and legal limits under the "One Country, Two Systems" framework, Willy Fu, a law professor who is also the director of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong & Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Friday.
In its closing submissions, the prosecution argued that the defendants' long-standing slogan of "ending one-party rule" was not merely a political advocacy campaign, but was essentially aimed at rejecting the leadership of the CPC and attempting to subvert the fundamental system of the state, Fu continued.
Such conduct, the prosecution argued, went far beyond the scope of freedom of expression protected by the Basic Law and the NSL for Hong Kong, and constituted an objective act of inciting subversion of state power through "unlawful means," Fu said.
In this case, the local court in Hong Kong clearly set out the Hong Kong courts' understanding and application of the provisions of the Chinese Constitution. The ruling will also serve as a legal principle and precedent, providing an important reference for future cases. It is consistent with legal principles and carries legal force, Chu Kar-kin, a veteran commentator based in the HKSAR and member of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Friday.
Hong Kong judges likewise need to receive comprehensive and systematic education on China's national Constitution, Chu said.
The Constitution is the fundamental law of the state and the most important component of the constitutional order of the HKSAR. The core of the constitutional order of the state is the establishment of the CPC's position as the governing party. The Preamble to the Constitution makes it clear that the leadership by the CPC is the core and foundation of the constitutional order of the PRC, a spokesperson from the HKSAR government said on Friday.
The HKSAR is an inalienable part of the PRC. The state provides the fundamental guarantee for the prosperity and development of Hong Kong, and the highest principle of "One Country, Two Systems" is to safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests, the spokesperson said.
The HKSAR Government will resolutely safeguard the fundamental system of the state established by the Constitution and the security of state power, and will, in strict accordance with the principle of the rule of law, prevent, suppress and punish acts and activities endangering national security with full force and in accordance with the law, the spokesperson added.
。 一 以学促干，强化引领 01 深学细悟全会精神 首先，由党支部组织委员方英老师带领党员老师们开展了《深入学习贯彻习近平总书记关于全面深化改革的一系列新思想、新观点、新论断和党的二十届三中全会精神》（谢春涛同志讲授）的政治理论学习，党员们重点学习了习近平总书记在讲话中提到的几大要点,通过这一重要讲话精神的学习，大家对于党的二十届三中全会精神又有了更深入地领悟。 02 “第一议题”学习 随后，全体党员教师认真开展“第一议题”的学习，深入学习习近平对社会工作作出的重要指示精神、对新时代马克思主义理论研究和建设工程作出的重要指示精神、在视察信息支援部队时强调的重要讲话精神、在考察湖北时的重要讲话精神、研究部署党风廉政建设和反腐败工作会议精神，学习李干杰在党员队伍建设工作座谈会上强调的重要讲话精神，持续学习省市区重要会议精神。深刻领会其核心要义与实践要求，认识到要发挥党建引领作用，创新治理方式，构建共建共治共享的管理格局，明确党员的先锋模范责任，增强为教育和校园和谐稳定发展贡献力量的使命感 二 知法于心，育人于行 接着，党支部副书记汪卉老师带领全体党员针对《中华人民共和国学前教育法》的内容和意义进行了专题党课学习。学习中书记围绕“为学前教育高质量发展提供有力法治保障；不忘初心、守正创新，面向未来办好学前教育；坚持公益普惠暖民心，维护儿童权益促发展”等向党员们进行讲解与解读，明确了该法的内容，分析了该法的意义。
B | 三 复盘全年，展望未来 最后，在2024年即将过去之际，党支部组织全体党员共同回顾了一年来的工作和成长。
C | 对标本年度既定的工作目标以及详细的重点任务清单，开启了一场全面且深入的复盘行动。 回顾2024 认真审视和分析全年各项任务情况，做好总结成绩、查摆问题、研究对策、谋划发展。同时围绕“凝心聚力，推进学校教育高质量发展”议题，广泛征集各方面、各层次意见建议，结合实际工作，积极谋划明年幼儿园党建工作布局、特色亮点，全力以赴打好年底收官战。 展望未来 党支部积极汇聚全体党员的智慧，共同探讨和规划工作思路。
D | 党员教师们提出的一系列具有前瞻性的建议，努力推动党建工作与业务深度融合等，为明年的支部工作提供了参考方向。 此次党员固定日活动在总结过往，展望未来中圆满结束。杭州市文澜幼儿园全体党员教师将以此次活动为契机，秉持“以学促干”的精神，用实际行动践行教育初心和使命担当，为教育高质量发展贡献力量。 编辑丨徐孟皓 初审丨孙晶一 终审丨汪 卉。
E |
Current article:http://2wcah04.binhannuxiangtulediatacang.cfd/news/20260826_68927.html
Published on:00:41:22